- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:07:27 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 19 June 2015 14:07:55 UTC
> So now we settled on the behavior @wanderview suggested: #361 (comment). > > @wanderview do you still have a concern about #665? Can I close both issues? Implementing that behavior sounds reasonable to me, but I think perhaps something is still missing. For example, I don't see where the incumbent record is cleared for a fetch record when the new response body completes. It seems the old incumbent should be dropped then. Am I missing it? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/361#issuecomment-113525831
Received on Friday, 19 June 2015 14:07:55 UTC