- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:27:38 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 03:28:13 UTC
> I guess I kind of was thinking that close() should automatically do respond(0) for you. But actually that is perhaps not a good idea. Nevermind! Yeah, we could. But it's possible if the underlying byte source wants to issue `controller.respond(0)`. If the underlying byte source has detached the given buffer, and then noticed that it's done, it has to issue `controller.close()` and then `controller.respond(0, buffer)` with the active buffer reference. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/295#issuecomment-112640370
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 03:28:13 UTC