Re: [dom] Rename replace() to replaceWith() (b7563aa)

I realy wondering why autor of this mail had problem with replace(), but not with before() and after()? 
A.before(B) << how did they deducated what must be done here? A set before B or B before A (without reading the spec?) 

Personally I don't like this change, all this new methods was short and clear enought, but now you put one longer and boom...camelCases. The only plus is that some other lib use this new name, but in practice I still prefer shorter name.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/b7563aaf0864c8d104d18c36a9eda036c5205131#commitcomment-11648161