Re: [webcomponents] isEncapsulated naming (#107)

Thanks. The term of the shadow tree is okay to use. I just wanted to avoid to use other term such as "ancestorTress", "inclusiveDescendantTrees" because it should be "ancestorNodeTrees", "inclusiveDescendantNodeTrees" in strict meaning. I omitted "Node" in the spec.

Yeah, I prefer the naming which should be false by default.

WDYT about `scopedToShadowTree`? Which is better between `confinedToShadowTree` or `scopedToShadowTree`? Is `confined` a familiar term for developers?


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/107#issuecomment-111036637