Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707)

A few points:

 - having access to cookies is a no-brainer. We can't prevent it (if there's a document, there's an API that already does it already); can we just get over our bad selves and get on with a design that does cookies better?
 - extra restrictions over what the current API can do need to be justified; the burden of proof is on removal, not equality of functionality
 - setting should be symmetric; if reading is async, setting should be too

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/707#issuecomment-110940363