- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:47:47 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 22:48:14 UTC
> rs1.pipeBytesTo(ws2, 1024); Interesting. This covers some of the use cases for https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/295#issuecomment-108980522 option (2). Pretty cool. Since pipeBytesTo would of course need to release its lock, I think that means the implementation of that at least would need to report back even in a pipeline situation. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/358#issuecomment-110939707
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 22:48:14 UTC