Re: [ServiceWorker] Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (#707)

> Alternately we can just say that cookies are stupid and putting lipstick on that pig is not a good idea.

Given that we so far did not introduce them in workers I think that might be okay. Just use cookies as synchronization token, and that's it...

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/707#issuecomment-110591459

Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 05:12:36 UTC