Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)

> Is it getting an update to the Shared worker part in the whatwg document,

Yep, I've asked for this at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28504#c4

>  looks like event.waitUntil already exists in the service worker spec, maybe that is enough?

Yep, this is the right way to signal ongoing activity in a service worker. There are a couple of things we need to think about, will make a separate comment for those.

> I can start a thread on the whatwg list about it.

That'd be great! Would show that multiple vendors are interested in this.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/678#issuecomment-110297694