- From: Philip Jägenstedt <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:58:44 -0700
- To: whatwg/xhr <xhr@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 07:59:17 UTC
Actually `ProgressEvent` is exposed only on `Window` in Blink, but I believe that's an oversight. I think the spec should expose all the interfaces in the same contexts and Blink should change. To me, throwing `InvalidAccessError` when sync XHR is attempted in any non-whitelisted context sounds pretty good. Which kinds of workers already depend on sync XHR I don't know, but we could measure it. @coonsta and @jakearchibald, thoughts? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/xhr/issues/19#issuecomment-110266104
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 07:59:17 UTC