Re: [streams] Readable byte streams should support an internal queue (#353)

Wait, upon re-reading I realize my argument may have been overzealous. controller.enqueue() is necessary---at least, that is the premise of this thread. But the intended usage is that you implement read(view) and then also use controller.enqueue() when your kernel buffer is overflowing (or similar). So I meant to argue against sourceSupportsByob and not against controller.enqueue().

(That said, the result of #295 might be that supporting both models is too hard and we have to remove controller.enqueue(). But in this thread we assume controller.enqueue() must stay and are discussing details like sourceSupportsByob.)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/353#issuecomment-108960643