- From: Johannes Wilm <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:00:33 -0700
- To: w3c/editing <editing@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 01:01:05 UTC
@klimlee So I think that if the option is to have overtype happen "automagically" without any way for the JS editor to know about this or to interfere with it, I would vote for dropping overtype altogether. It can always be reintroduced in a later version of the spec. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/55#issuecomment-108146001
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2015 01:01:05 UTC