Re: [ServiceWorker] Proposal: Optimized No-Fetch Service Workers (#718)

@aykevl I don't think that is true, developers can appropriately specify the `scope` attribute in the `Registration Options` when they register a SW to say what URLs the site wants their SW to take care of for fetch events. That's one of the most basic fundamental of how SW is designed to work.

Also a feature like background sync is a way to give more flexible options for a site to choose when it talks to the server, it can't work without network access but it'd be nearly useless if its SW doesn't handle fetch events when network access is not available.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/718#issuecomment-125065317