- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:34:17 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 16:34:47 UTC
> Can't figure out why this is needed/useful. So you have some kind of identifer for the object if you decide to store it. I fully expect `Request` and `Response` objects to end up in storage at one point or another. > If the SW returns an opaque redirect, the skip-service-worker flag could be set on the request. Doesn't this do the right thing? Isn't that the opposite of what we want to be doing? > Doesn't that algorithm have to handle redirects already? Not opaque ones. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/66#issuecomment-120987982
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 16:34:47 UTC