Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)

@igrigorik You're reading it wrong.

I'm explicitly opposed to exposing it in `fetch()` until implementations have worked through the security implications. I'm implicitly opposed to implementing at all, given the complexities in doing it correctly (on both ends) for the value it returns (thus agreeing with Martin on questioning the use cases as compelling). But you should read the explicit greater than the implicit, and you should replace seeing it as FUD (although there is each of those) with "This has been repeatedly botched with stream aborts, and this adds a whole new attack surface, so there should be demonstrable value"

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/34#issuecomment-119260201

Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2015 16:26:09 UTC