- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:38:51 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/201@github.com>
Title: [Custom]: Add the possibility to extend the custom element (bugzilla: 26583) Migrated from: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26583 ---- comment: 0 comment_url: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26583#c0 ** wrote on 2014-08-14 08:41:54 +0000. Example: var Modal = document.registerElement('x-modal', { prototype: Object.create(HTMLElement, {/* modal generic prototype */}) }) var WebcamModal = document.registerElement('x-webcam', { extends: 'x-modal', prototype: Object.create(Modal, { /* webcam modal specific prototype */ show: { value: function() { Modal.prototype.show.call(this) // run webcam } } }) }) \<x-modal\>\</x-modal\> \<x-modal is="webcam">\</x-modal\> And will be cool if will be possible to have a non-dashed name of extend name (is="webcam" instead is="x-webcam"). ---- comment: 1 comment_url: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26583#c1 *Tab Atkins Jr.* wrote on 2014-08-14 14:57:20 +0000. There is no "non-dashed version" of a name, because there's no common structure to the name that we can safely ignore. The sole requirements it that a dash appears *somewhere* in the name, so it can occur between or around significant or insignificant parts, and there's no way to tell automatically what parts are insignificant. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/201
Received on Monday, 6 July 2015 07:39:36 UTC