Re: [fetch] Proposed backward-incompatible change: requiring cloning all requests/responses (#61)

@annevk the way I thought it worked was the new request's stream would be piping the stream of the request passed to its constructor. So:

```js
var r1 = new Request(url, { body: stream });
var r2 = new Request(r1);
```

Both `r1` and `r2` would have separate streams. `r2` would read from `r1`'s stream to get the output for its stream.

However, your model avoids the additional stream, which I guess is better as long as the transfer isn't confusing for developers.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/61#issuecomment-117575266