Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)

I had the impression `unregister()` was the way to remove a single service worker and there would be no protocol equivalent.

If we want a protocol solution to removing a service worker, using HTTP 410 seems much more applicable.

Using `none` as keyword to forbid workers of any kind seems fine although it's a bit unclear to me how you disambiguate that from a relative URL. Would we require URLs in that header to start with a slash?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/604#issuecomment-72308848