- From: Yutaka Hirano <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:07:32 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 05:10:45 UTC
> @@ -558,8 +558,13 @@ Instances of <code>ReadableStream</code> are created with the internal slots des > </div> > > <ol> > - <li> If <b>this</b>@\[[reader]] is not <b>undefined</b>, return <b>this</b>@\[[reader]]@\[[lockReleased]]. > - <li> Return <b>this</b>@\[[readyPromise]]. > + <li> If <b>this</b>@\[[readableStreamReader]] is not <b>undefined</b>, return the result of transforming > + <b>this</b>@\[[readableStreamReader]]@\[[lockReleased]] by a fulfillment handler that returns <b>this</b>@\[[readyPromise]]. Shouldn't this@[[readyPromise]] be Get(this, "ready")? The current rule exposes the resolution that should be hidden in the following sequence. 1. The stream is locked to a reader. 1. `.ready` is accessed and some handlers are attached on it. 1. The reader is released. 1. The stream is locked to another reader. 1. Data is enqueued and stream@[[readyPromise]] is resolved. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/262/files#r22990833
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 05:10:45 UTC