- From: Frederico Caldeira Knabben <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 06:11:54 -0800
- To: w3c/editing-explainer <editing-explainer@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 14:12:20 UTC
@kojiishi, @rniwa, I think the following summarizes what both of you are looking for (from [my previous comment](#issuecomment-67144328)): > Option 3: completely ignore execCommand and see this as an independent API out of the contenteditable specs and scope. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/editing-explainer/issues/33#issuecomment-68712194
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 14:12:20 UTC