- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 02:52:53 -0800
- To: w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web <packaging-on-the-web@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 2 January 2015 10:53:26 UTC
A new IETF working group [arcmedia](https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia) is forming, [proposing the top-level media-type archive/](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-kerwin-arcmedia-type). Should Packaging-on-the-web register as the media type `archive/package` instead of `application/package`? I would argue yes - if you intend for a package to be browsable as an archive. It might be beneficial for Packaging-on-the-web folks to join the [arcmedia mailing list](https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia). Related to #11. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/packaging-on-the-web/issues/13
Received on Friday, 2 January 2015 10:53:26 UTC