Saturday, 31 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
Friday, 30 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should an IFRAME without src be controlled by SW when its parent is controlled? (#612)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should an IFRAME without src be controlled by SW when its parent is controlled? (#612)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should an IFRAME without src be controlled by SW when its parent is controlled? (#612)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- [ServiceWorker] Should an IFRAME without src be controlled by SW when its parent is controlled? (#612)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
Thursday, 29 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [push-api] Figure out why tidy produces inconsistent formatting (#39)
- Re: [push-api] Figure out why tidy produces inconsistent formatting (#39)
- Re: [push-api] See if dfn.js can help (#40)
- Re: [push-api] Consider exposing meta-information on push message (#81)
- Re: [push-api] Consider exposing meta-information on push message (#81)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Fix URL of ContentEditable spec. (#45)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [push-api] Push API should be allowed without dependency on service worker (#84)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- [editing-explainer] Fix URL of ContentEditable spec. (#45)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- [ServiceWorker] Hints in beforeevicted to let the SW of a web app pick among several house cleaning options? (#611)
- Re: [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Clarify display-mode relationship to iframes and legacy content (#309)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (#306)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (#306)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (#306)
- [manifest] Clarify display-mode relationship to iframes and legacy content (#309)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should the term be Device Independent Events? (#7)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
Wednesday, 28 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585)
- Re: [streams] Fixed cancel test on errored stream (#274)
- Re: [streams] Fixed cancel test on errored stream (#274)
- Re: [streams] Fixed cancel test on errored stream (#274)
- Re: [editing-explainer] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Prevent recursive beforeInput calls (#44)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should Device-Specific Input Events say what Responsive Input Event they will cause? (#25)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Need to spec the data in beforeInput event (#29)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How do we feature detect Responsive Input Events? (#32)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How do we feature detect Responsive Input Events? (#32)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [selection-api] Add APIs to save/restore selection (#43)
- Re: [selection-api] Add APIs to save/restore selection (#43)
- Re: [selection-api] Add APIs to save/restore selectiona (#42)
- [selection-api] Add APIs to save/restore selection (#43)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Add "intention" integration point to 'beforeinput' event's interface (#42)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Add "intention" integration point to 'beforeinput' event's interface (#42)
- Re: [editing-explainer] added some comments to point out intents from components (#15)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Links should use <a> tag and not MD syntax (#40)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- [streams] Fixed cancel test on errored stream (#274)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there going to be a Chinese version? (#34)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (63f8448)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (63f8448)
- Re: [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (63f8448)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Convert readable stream pull() to promise-returning (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [manifest] Preparing for CR (#307)
- Re: [manifest] Preparing for CR (#307)
- [manifest] [meta] transition doc. to CR at W3C (#308)
- Re: [manifest] Preparing for CR (#307)
- [manifest] Preparing for CR (#307)
- [manifest] Enhanced privacy/security considerations (closes #305) (#306)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there going to be a Chinese version? (#34)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there going to be a Chinese version? (#34)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there going to be a Chinese version? (#34)
- [webcomponents] Is there going to be a Chinese version? (#34)
Tuesday, 27 January 2015
- Re: [streams] Add way to get URL of current spec commit snapshot (#223)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] installing/waiting/activating state transition event and state lead to confusion. (#539)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Add missing methods to the ReadableByteStream class definition (#273)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] Add read() method to ReadableByteStream (#214)
- [streams] Add missing methods to the ReadableByteStream class definition (#273)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() then register() same-scope, different script URL that fails: what do you expect to happen? (#396)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [streams] Document globals created by this spec (#254)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [streams] Promises based transform() (#185)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] Remove x180E (#3)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] Remove x180E (#3)
- [streams] Convert readable stream pull() to promise-returning (#272)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] Remove x180E (#3)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271)
Monday, 26 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [streams] Add read() method to ReadableByteStream (#214)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] Remove x180E (#3)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- [packaged-webapps] Remove x180E (#3)
- [packaged-webapps] x180E no longer a Unicode whitespace (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible ambiguity with "run these steps asynchronously" (#403)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Possible ambiguity with "run these steps asynchronously" (#403)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() then register() same-scope, different script URL that fails: what do you expect to happen? (#396)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() then register() same-scope, different script URL that fails: what do you expect to happen? (#396)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Changing ServiceWorkerClient.hidden to visibilityState (#498)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Changing ServiceWorkerClient.hidden to visibilityState (#498)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clarify if Cache put()/add()/addAll() should mark Request body used (#550)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clarify if Cache put()/add()/addAll() should mark Request body used (#550)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove registration from Client? (#608)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove registration from Client? (#608)
Sunday, 25 January 2015
Saturday, 24 January 2015
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- [selection-api] Add APIs to save/restore selectiona (#42)
- Re: [streams] Promises based transform() (#185)
Friday, 23 January 2015
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [streams] Reorganize examples (#255)
- Re: [streams] Add, re-do, and reorganize a bunch of examples (#270)
- Re: [streams] Spec brand checks (#261)
- Re: [webidl] Remove a duplicate word. (#41)
- [webidl] Remove a duplicate word. (#41)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Move installEvent.replace() onto ServiceWorkerClients (#518)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() then register() same-scope, different script URL that fails: what do you expect to happen? (#396)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Add example showing Streamable Package Format for packaged web app (#8)
Thursday, 22 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Is Node's "unshift" necessary? (#3)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [streams] Should delegate functions of underlying sink/source return promises or call given functions (#130)
- Re: [streams] Should delegate functions of underlying sink/source return promises or call given functions (#130)
- Re: [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256)
- Re: [streams] First class source sink objects (#265)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] unregister() then register() same-scope, different script URL that fails: what do you expect to happen? (#396)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- [ServiceWorker] Rename clients.getAll() (#610)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] Replace { input, output } with { writable, readable } (35c68a4)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolving null & using WindowClient (8e7dfc9)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove registration from Client? (#608)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resolving null & using WindowClient (8e7dfc9)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- [streams] Add, re-do, and reorganize a bunch of examples (#270)
- Re: [webidl] MapClass should not put Map.prototype in the prototype chain (#11)
- Re: [webidl] MapClass should not put Map.prototype in the prototype chain (#11)
Wednesday, 21 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- [push-api] Discovering relevant service timers (#111)
- [editing-explainer] Document "unsafe to dispatch events" in D3E if it's possible (#44)
- [editing-explainer] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- [editing-explainer] Add "intention" integration point to 'beforeinput' event's interface (#42)
- [editing-explainer] D3E defines input event should be fired immediately after the DOM as been updated but it shouldn't be so if the editor value is changed by setting value attribute (#41)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove registration from Client? (#608)
- Re: [streams] First class source sink objects (#265)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Timing of events relative to initial script load (#605)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Timing of events relative to initial script load (#605)
- Re: [streams] First class source sink objects (#265)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Add Attributes section (#32)
- Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Add Attributes section (#32)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] Add a test showing that waiting → waiting is completely fixed (d29eafa)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [webidl] Fix a typo in editorial note for @@toStringTag (#39)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [webidl] Fix a typo in editorial note for @@toStringTag (#39)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
Tuesday, 20 January 2015
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [webidl] Only use the named properties object as [[Prototype]] if it exists. (#40)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24)
- Re: [webidl] Only use the named properties object as [[Prototype]] if it exists. (#40)
- [webidl] Only use the named properties object as [[Prototype]] if it exists. (#40)
- Re: [streams] Make the promise returned by rs.ready consult rs.ready again on resoluti... (#268)
- Re: [streams] Make the promise returned by rs.ready consult rs.ready again on resoluti... (#268)
- Re: [streams] ready fulfilling when state ends up being "waiting" due to reading in the same turn (#263)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [streams] Make reader.closed return the result of racing closedPromise and lockRel... (#267)
- Re: [streams] Make reader.closed return the result of racing closedPromise and lockRel... (#267)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
- [ServiceWorker] Remove registration from Client? (#608)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- [ServiceWorker] Can we change the body attribute of Request/Response to a method? (#606)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] ready fulfilling when state ends up being "waiting" due to reading in the same turn (#263)
- [ServiceWorker] Timing of events relative to initial script load (#605)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [streams] Make the promise returned by rs.ready consult rs.ready again on resoluti... (#268)
- [streams] Make the promise returned by rs.ready consult rs.ready again on resoluti... (#268)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [streams] Rename [[reader]] internal slot to [[readableStreamReader]] (3e5e0fc)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [streams] Make reader.closed return the result of racing closedPromise and lockRel... (#267)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
- [ServiceWorker] Service-Worker-Allowed header (#604)
- Re: [streams] Make released stream readers look like closed streams (e119976)
- [streams] Make reader.closed return the result of racing closedPromise and lockRel... (#267)
- Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
- Re: [push-api] Multiple registrations per origin/SW (#71)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
Monday, 19 January 2015
- [webidl] Fix a typo in editorial note for @@toStringTag (#39)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)
- Re: [streams] Make released stream readers look like closed streams (e119976)
- Re: [streams] Add ability to exclusively lock a readable stream (63372f5)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Spec for openWindow(). Part of #603. (6fd0399)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] Multiple registrations per origin/SW (#71)
- Re: [push-api] PushSubscription should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] Multiple registrations per origin/SW (#71)
- Re: [push-api] PushRegistration should have an attribute for ExpirationTime (#86)
- Re: [push-api] Push-api / HTML5-Notification Permissions (#3)
- [push-api] Better description of pushsubscriptionchange, with more likely reason. (#110)
- Re: [push-api] pushsubscriptionchange (was pushregistrationlost) use case (#74)
- Re: [push-api] Better description of pushsubscriptionchange, with more likely reason. (#110)
- Re: [push-api] Permission checks in the push API (#75)
- Re: [push-api] Permission checks in the push API (#75)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- Re: [streams] How will ReadableByteStream work with seekable resources? (#253)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- [ServiceWorker] Is the ServiceWorker also a client? (#603)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [streams] Make released stream readers look like closed streams (e119976)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [streams] Make released stream readers look like closed streams (e119976)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [streams] Add ability to exclusively lock a readable stream (63372f5)
- [webcomponents] [Shadow DOM] Add Attributes section (#32)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [webcomponents] updated after feedback (c8db797)
Sunday, 18 January 2015
- Re: [url] Update csharp test to identify .net fwk version (#46)
- Re: [url] Update csharp test to identify .net fwk version (#46)
- [url] Update csharp test to identify .net fwk version (#46)
Saturday, 17 January 2015
- [packaging-on-the-web] fixing typo (#20)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [selection-api] Support multi range selection (#41)
- [editing-explainer] Links should use <a> tag and not MD syntax (#40)
- [streams] First class source sink objects (#265)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592)
Friday, 16 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592)
- Re: [streams] Make stream readers look closed when released (#260)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- [streams] Factor out portions of a test suite that can be run against already-constructed streams (#264)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [push-api] Push subscription should require active Service Worker (#92)
- Re: [push-api] Require an active service worker for subscribe. (#108)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- [manifest] check against security/privacy questions (#305)
- Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- [manifest] Consider making display a space-separated list of tokens (#304)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename InstallPhaseEvent to ExtendableEvent (#448)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [streams] Add way to get URL of current spec commit snapshot (#223)
- Re: [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256)
Thursday, 15 January 2015
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- [streams] ready fulfilling when state ends up being "waiting" due to reading in the same turn (#263)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [push-api] Push subscription should require active Service Worker (#92)
- Re: [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100)
- Re: [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- [ServiceWorker] Specify .focus() and .openWindow() behaviour (#602)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Redefined identity to make it os centric (closes #272) (#303)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302)
- Re: [manifest] Clarify launching from a deep link. (#301)
Wednesday, 14 January 2015
- [streams] Reader fixups (#262)
- [streams] Spec brand checks (#261)
- Re: [manifest] Redefined identity to make it os centric (closes #272) (#303)
- [push-api] Require an active service worker for subscribe and getSubscription. (#108)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Custom Elements (#16)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Custom Elements (#16)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [url] Import Node.js tests (#42)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Errors inside Promises are not thrown (#600)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [push-api] Should push registration wait for Service Worker activation? (#38)
- Re: [push-api] Should push registration wait for Service Worker activation? (#38)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Resolve with null if not registered. (#101)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [url] Adding Ruby 'uri' standard library to tested implementations (#45)
- Re: [url] Adding Ruby 'uri' standard library to tested implementations (#45)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- [url] Adding Ruby 'uri' standard library to tested implementations (#45)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- [manifest] Redefined identity to make it os centric (closes #272) (#303)
- Re: [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302)
- [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [streams] Add IsReadableStreamLocked abstract operation (#259)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- [manifest] Clarify launching from a deep link. (#301)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
- Re: [selection-api] Support multi range selection (#41)
- [selection-api] Support multi range selection (#41)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- [webidl] Followup for bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 to to deal with inherited interfaces that are [NoInterfaceObject]. (#38)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [push-api] Define PermissionDeniedError. (#106)
- Re: [push-api] Link to definition of secure origin instead of mentioning https only (#79)
- [ServiceWorker] Need for linkable and reusable section that defines the https restriction (#601)
- Re: [push-api] Define PermissionDeniedError. (#106)
- [push-api] Refer to reusable definition of PermissionDeniedError once that becomes available (#107)
- Re: [push-api] Define PermissionDeniedError. (#106)
- [push-api] Define PermissionDeniedError. (#106)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [push-api] PushRegisterMessage => PushError (#18)
- Re: [push-api] Resolve with null if not registered. (#101)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Errors inside Promises are not thrown (#600)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [push-api] Consider renaming pushregistrationlost (#82)
- Re: [push-api] Rename pushsubscriptionlost to pushsubscriptionchange. (#105)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Errors inside Promises are not thrown (#600)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Errors inside Promises are not thrown (#600)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Errors inside Promises are not thrown (#600)
- [ServiceWorker] Promises inside Service workers don't throw errors (#600)
- Re: [webidl] Fix https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 (#37)
- Re: [webidl] Fix https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 (#37)
- Re: [webidl] Fix https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- [webidl] Fix https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23133 (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
Monday, 12 January 2015
- Re: [streams] Garbage collection (#252)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- [push-api] Rename pushsubscriptionlost to pushsubscriptionchange. (#105)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [push-api] Consider renaming pushregistrationlost (#82)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [push-api] Consider renaming pushregistrationlost (#82)
- Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost use case (#74)
- Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost use case (#74)
- Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost use case (#74)
- Re: [push-api] pushregistrationlost use case (#74)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] WindowClient.focus() resolves with updated WindowClient. (#599)
- [ServiceWorker] WindowClient.focus() resolves with updated WindowClient. (#599)
- Re: [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
Sunday, 11 January 2015
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#299)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (#298)
- Re: [manifest] density doesn't make a lot of sense for SVG (#279)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (#298)
- [ServiceWorker] Do not want ServiceWorker to interrupt a specific request (#598)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
Saturday, 10 January 2015
- [push-api] events should be part of PushSubscription (#104)
- [editing-explainer] Target range in device independent events (#39)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Is it safe to deploy over plain-text HTTP? (#19)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Update Web Animations.md (#39)
Friday, 9 January 2015
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Is it safe to deploy over plain-text HTTP? (#19)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Why not use `Content-Encoding`? (#17)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Is it safe to deploy over plain-text HTTP? (#19)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (c4fa442)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (a2e8c31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make it clear that Cache and caches are to be available on page (#297)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make it clear that Cache and caches are to be available on page (#297)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Client versus resource for workers, frames, etc. (#345)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Batch adding to a cache should fail if one request in the batch overwrites another (#379)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Batch adding to a cache should fail if one request in the batch overwrites another (#379)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerGlobalScope needs Exposed=ServiceWorker or Exposed=Worker or something (#391)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerGlobalScope needs Exposed=ServiceWorker or Exposed=Worker or something (#391)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] [Exposed] annotations on InstallEvent an ServiceWorker make no sense (#395)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] [Exposed] annotations on InstallEvent an ServiceWorker make no sense (#395)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] clarify ServiceWorkerGlobalScope.caches is per-origin (#415)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] clarify ServiceWorkerGlobalScope.caches is per-origin (#415)
- Re: [manifest] [Meta] Test suite (#210)
- Re: [manifest] [Meta] Test suite (#210)
- Re: [manifest] Editorial cleanup (#300)
- Re: [manifest] Editorial cleanup (#300)
- [manifest] Editorial cleanup (#300)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose ServiceWorkerRegistration within ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#421)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Expose ServiceWorkerRegistration within ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#421)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClientQueryParams includeUncontrolled and algorithm are at odds (#428)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClientQueryParams includeUncontrolled and algorithm are at odds (#428)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#299)
- [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#299)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#297)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] caches.create should return existing cache if it already exists (#458)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] caches.create should return existing cache if it already exists (#458)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] shortcuts to content vs shortcut to app (#167)
- Re: [manifest] shortcuts to content vs shortcut to app (#167)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClients.getAll should be sorted by recency (#499)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClients.getAll should be sorted by recency (#499)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need a linkable section for "start up a service worker if it is not running" (#501)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Need a linkable section for "start up a service worker if it is not running" (#501)
- Re: [manifest] Allow name to be a String or Language Map (#211)
- Re: [manifest] Allow name to be a String or Language Map (#211)
- Re: [manifest] Include languages into manifest (#208)
- Re: [manifest] Include languages into manifest (#208)
- [manifest] Explained how density relates to SVG (closes #279) (#298)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Move installEvent.replace() onto ServiceWorkerClients (#518)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Move installEvent.replace() onto ServiceWorkerClients (#518)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Merge service worker client into "environment settings object" (#516)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Merge service worker client into "environment settings object" (#516)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent.respondWith() should check the used flag of the response (#567)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent.respondWith() should check the used flag of the response (#567)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
Thursday, 8 January 2015
- [streams] Make stream readers look closed when released (#260)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- [streams] Add IsReadableStreamLocked abstract operation (#259)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
- [spec-reviews] Subresource Integrity (#43)
- [spec-reviews] CSP (#42)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebAppSec reviews (#36)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebAppSec reviews (#36)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions (#35)
- Re: [spec-reviews] multipart/form-data (#34)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Manifest spec (#30)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Manifest spec (#30)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC Identity Provider Selection (#28)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC Identity Provider Selection (#28)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web NFC API (#22)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Beacon (#23)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Beacon (#23)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web NFC API (#22)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Timing 2 (#18)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Custom Elements (#16)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- [spec-reviews] CSS Variables (#41)
- [spec-reviews] JSON Form Submission (#40)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Why not use `Content-Encoding`? (#17)
- [packaging-on-the-web] When is the SPF stream finished? Is Content-Length enough? (#18)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Zip CAN be streaming (#14)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [push-api] Rename registration to subscription to align with Web Push protocol. (#102)
- Re: [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93)
- Re: [push-api] The endpoint is of type USVString. (#103)
- [push-api] The endpoint is of type USVString. (#103)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Why not use `Content-Encoding`? (#17)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Vary header use (#16)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [selection-api] Need a way to get BiDi dir from Range (#21)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [selection-api] Need a way to get combining character status from Range or offset (#31)
- Re: [manifest] Conditional system for handling future extensions (#168)
- Re: [manifest] Conditional system for handling future extensions (#168)
- Re: [manifest] Use input / output model for algos (#227)
- Re: [manifest] Use input / output model for algos (#227)
- Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288)
- Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [url] Cannot find module 'pegjs' (#40)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
Wednesday, 7 January 2015
- [spec-reviews] Update Web Animations.md (#39)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC Identity Provider Selection (#28)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Wake lock (#32)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Wake lock (#32)
- Re: [url] rdflib.js has a URI parser and relativizer (#44)
- [url] rdflib.js has a URI parser and relativizer (#44)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Clarify zip streaming discussion. Fixes #14. (#15)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Zip CAN be streaming (#14)
- [url] Old python URI parser from SWAP (#43)
- [url] Import Node.js tests (#42)
- [url] Add a "relativizer" function to the API (#41)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Push API should support SW event.waitUntil (#85)
- Re: [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Need to clarify how this relates to HTTP2 (#1)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Clarify zip streaming discussion. Fixes #14. (#15)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Add example showing Streamable Package Format for packaged web app (#8)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] "scope" attribute (#9)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] "scope" attribute (#9)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Populating Caches (#10)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Populating Caches (#10)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Zip CAN be streaming (#14)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Streaming Packaging Format (#12)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Use new archive/ top-level media type? (#13)
- Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Use new archive/ top-level media type? (#13)
- [push-api] Rename registration to subscription to align with Web Push protocol. (#102)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClients.getAll should be sorted by recency (#499)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
Tuesday, 6 January 2015
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- Re: [selection-api] Why does getRangeAt must return a reference to (not a copy of) the range? (#40)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [editing-explainer] removed the protocol to link to respec (#38)
- Re: [selection-api] Why does getRangeAt must return a reference to (not a copy of) the range? (#40)
- [editing-explainer] removed the protocol to link to respec (#38)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [webcomponents] change acc name advice (#31)
- Re: [webcomponents] change acc name advice (#31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make ExtendableEvent#waitUntil generic (#554)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [push-api] Resolve with null if not registered. (#101)
- Re: [push-api] Resolve with null if not registered. (#101)
- [push-api] Resolve with null if not registered. (#101)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Multi-author sites (#468)
- Re: [url] Cannot find module 'pegjs' (#40)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [url] Cannot find module 'pegjs' (#40)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] location.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] loaction.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] loaction.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- [ServiceWorker] loaction.reload(true) should reload without ServiceWorker (#597)
- Re: [url] Cannot find module 'pegjs' (#40)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- [selection-api] Why does getRangeAt must return a reference to (not a copy of) the range? (#40)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- [streams] [Reader] Should resolve readyPromise on getReader() call? (#258)
- Re: [streams] Some minor refinements plus thought process (33c2985)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache object grammar (#494)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache object grammar (#494)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] new ServiceWorkerClient makes no sense? (#511)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] new ServiceWorkerClient makes no sense? (#511)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects and workers (#528)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects and workers (#528)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [streams] Reorganize examples (#255)
Monday, 5 January 2015
- Re: [streams] Some minor refinements plus thought process (33c2985)
- Re: [url] Cannot find module 'pegjs' (#40)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] [[register]] entry settings object's API (#336)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [streams] Some minor refinements plus thought process (33c2985)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
Sunday, 4 January 2015
Saturday, 3 January 2015
- [webidl] Fix DOMException-related nits. (#36)
- Re: [webidl] Stringifier says it requires DOMString, but should also allow USVString (#35)
Friday, 2 January 2015
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Zip CAN be streaming (#14)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Use new archive/ top-level media type? (#13)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
Thursday, 1 January 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Inclusion of `referer` in preflight `Access-Control-Request-Headers` despite not being set (#596)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Inclusion of `referer` in preflight `Access-Control-Request-Headers` despite not being set (#596)
- Re: [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39)
- Re: [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Inclusion of `referer` in preflight `Access-Control-Request-Headers` despite not being set (#596)
- Re: [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39)
- Re: [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)