Re: [ServiceWorker] Byte by byte match does not capture developer friendly behaviour (#639)

Conversely, I've seen devs use this behaviour deliberately. Eg:

```js
importScripts("actualloglc-v1.js");
```

The reason they've done this is to "keep the update check really small". I'm not a fan of this as etags are a better fit, but it is what devs are doing.

In the case of:

```js
importScripts("//other-origin/third-party.js");
```

…I'm not sure I want the third party to decide when a new version of my SW should be created.

@nikhilm in your example, what's the benefit of the import vs just including the script?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/639#issuecomment-76144703

Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 09:12:04 UTC