- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:18:41 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 04:19:08 UTC
Re: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/253#issuecomment-75790533 by Domenic, Good point. If we can get the new ArrayBuffer reference but pointing to the same underlying buffer on completion, it's ok? ``` let newBuffer = await rbs.readInto(ab, 0, ab.byteLength); // here, ab is neutered. return newBuffer; ``` If readInto() may return when it finishes writing partial data, ``` let result = await rbs.readInto(ab, 0, ab.byteLength); // here, ab is neutered. return result; // result.ab is a new reference. result.size is the number of bytes written ``` Or, adopt ArrayBufferView based approach, ``` let newView = await rbs.readInto(view); // here, view is neutered. return newView; ``` `newView` specifies the region to which data have been written. `newView` and `view` are different references, and `newView.buffer` and `view.buffer` are also different references. `view` and `view.buffer` are both neutered on `readInto()` call. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/253#issuecomment-75903137
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 04:19:08 UTC