Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)

Yeah, that is still totally doable and the plan. The main thing this changes is that service workers can no longer continue a fetch from the document while also intercepting it. (Instead they'll make a new fetch following policies of the service worker.) That was a rather weird feature to begin with that we didn't fully explain so I don't think it's a huge loss.

So at this point the next step would be for the SW specification to drop `default()`.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/607#issuecomment-74678240