Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)

We have two votes in IRC in favor of no-op.

wanderview says:

> I prefer silent... you're asking it to enter a state... its already in that state... not an error (in my opinion)

JakeA says:

> agree with wanderview. It's in the spirit of clearTimeout(123456)

On Twitter though we have [indutny with](https://twitter.com/indutny/status/565197514580967425)

> fail out loudly.

and [bradleymeck with](https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/565199162027675648)

> silent on the result (don't make a closed stream turn into error), error on the caller pretty violently.

(I'm not @-mentioning anyone since I don't feel a need for them to get emails for everything else on this thread.)

So, uh, I dunno.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/266#issuecomment-73767461