Re: [ServiceWorker] 304 handling for fetch() (#412)

BTW, I just repeat what Gecko does when Cache-control: no-store header is received on a response.

The main point I originally wanted to make was that "bypass" doesn't mean "no-store" (which could be ambiguous with the cache-control header value.)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/412#issuecomment-73510884

Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 13:50:34 UTC