- From: Tobias Buschor <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:50:02 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/issues/161/73291053@github.com>
isn't AppCache polyfillable with ServiceWorkers? 2015-02-06 16:26 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Kippe <notifications@github.com>: > what's the basis of your sniping? > > Sorry, nothing personal. You just rant a lot about it in public. > > From the Chrome team perspective, I can say that we will rip AppCache out > of the product as soon as our largest users are converted to SWs. I expect > that to happen this year. > > You'll completely remove support for a working Web Platform spec from your > browser, rendering currently working offline apps broken?! It's not a > <blink> element exactly. People rely on this to cache their app assets > today. > > (what my article and talk didn't cover is the huge security issues of > appcache, to sites using appcache & appcache as an attack vector. It needs > deprecated, quickly) > > Would be great if you could link us a resource covering that! Much > appreciated. > > I'm told that Mozilla are just as keen, if not keener, to remove appcache > from Firefox. > > ... where it currently supports offline Web apps on FF OS, Android, > Windows, OS X and Linux. Great idea! > > Other than this, I think @benfrancis <https://github.com/benfrancis> > summed up the list of unanswered questions about it quite well. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/161#issuecomment-73253191>. > -- Freundliche Grüsse Tobias Buschor shwups GmbH Talstrasse 1 9000 St. Gallen +41 76 321 23 21 shwups.ch --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/161#issuecomment-73291053
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 18:50:36 UTC