- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:30:31 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 11:30:58 UTC
580327931c95c50adbdfaaaffdf53064ee486b2d looks good. Please think of this scenario: 1. `rs.read()` is called 1. `pull()` is called to refill the queue 1. `pull()` called `enqueue()` to fill up the queue and returned 1. `rs.read()` is called 1. `rs.read()` is called 1. `rs.read()` is called ... Even if the `read()` calls drain the queue, `pull()` won't be called until the next microtask is run. Are you aware of this? I'm fine with this but want to confirm. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/272#issuecomment-73032234
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 11:30:58 UTC