Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266)

Domenic. Had a look at your change. It's nice work but as Yutaka pointed out, it's revealing the internal state.

This issue made me rethink the whole architecture. We gave up a lot recently such as that the reader can be used for stream subclasses, etc. It looks the current implementation is twisted for no longer valid requirements.

I made a PR #277 which uses a lot of interaction on hidden variables between the stream and reader but realizes the promise identity requirement perfectly (i.e. the ideal stability in https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/266#issuecomment-72658409). Do you think this violates any of still-valid design requirements?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/266#issuecomment-72877745