- From: Michael van Ouwerkerk <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:20:42 -0800
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 14:21:12 UTC
I think we can simplify the spec terminology and further align with the protocol [1] as follows: * **push client** is only used in the diagram, and whether it is part of the user agent or a separate entity running on the same system is an implementation detail. The spec otherwise never refers to this term. It can be removed from the diagram. * **push server** overlaps an awful lot with **push service** and one could simply state once that a **push service** has a server. After that, I think we can avoid using this term and always refer to the **push service** instead. The protocol spec already largely avoids this term, and I think we could remove it entirely. * **push service** the definition of this one can probably be clarified, and take a piece or two from the term **push server** which I propose can then be removed. 1 - https://martinthomson.github.io/drafts/draft-thomson-webpush-http2.html --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/113
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 14:21:12 UTC