- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:01:48 -0800
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 07:02:18 UTC
@wanderview @mattto I just updated the spec as discussed: 7b49e85bf2fa1ec36be583abbff018084e78af28. The basic behavior is: - It uses a single job queue where register/update/unregister job is scheduled in FIFO order. - The same job is aggregated when scheduled. - The UA dooms installing worker in favor of the next job in the queue if possible I intended to write it conforming to the current implementation. Please review it. /cc @slightlyoff @jakearchibald @annevk --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/783#issuecomment-165696844
Received on Friday, 18 December 2015 07:02:18 UTC