Re: [webidl] Add a [SecureContext] operator attribute (#65)

No worries, thanks for the time you've spent on it already, @bzbarsky. If @heycam has time, brilliant. If not, January seems like a fine time to clean up the patch.

> one thing that I think needs to be clarified is that [SecureContext] does not dynamically
> change exposure with the secure context state

I'll try to clean up the text in the `[SecureContext]` section. I talked around that point, but I failed to state it explicitly.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/65#issuecomment-163935278