Re: [webcomponents] [Shadow]: Need an equivalent definition of 'in a Document' for shadow trees (bugzilla: 26365) (#57)

@rniwa 
Yeah, that's exactly what we had discussed in this thread and we agreed on that. I am happy to hear that you have the same opinion. "In a document" will stay on a purely DOM concern.

Regarding with inertness, I agree that it's not good idea to re-use "inetness" in the Shadow DOM spec.
I guess we might want to have another good well-defined terminology.


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/57#issuecomment-161602191