Thursday, 30 April 2015
- Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43)
- Re: [uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- [ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker is not defined (#689)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349)
- Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- [streams] Non-normative descriptions are missing for ReadableStreamController (#350)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300)
- Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312)
- Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312)
- Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349)
- [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688)
- Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348)
- Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348)
- Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348)
- [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
Wednesday, 29 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375)
- Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375)
- [manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376)
- [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] fix typo in `independent_policies.svg` filename (#374)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (5a15e3f)
- [manifest] fix typo in `independent_policies.svg` filename (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688)
- [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Not Found Error instead of undefined response (#666)
- [spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369)
- Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369)
- [manifest] Add support for 9-Patch Images for splash screen (#373)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (#368)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366)
- Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (859f05b)
- Re: [manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (#367)
- Re: [manifest] For `lang`, add formal defintion of language tag (#331)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] A means to specify the min time a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- [manifest] A means to specify the min time a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1)
- Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1)
- Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1)
- Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1)
- Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (299aa96)
- Re: [manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (f482329)
- Re: [manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (2d7a18b)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (859f05b)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
Monday, 27 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330)
- [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#371)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370)
- [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369)
- [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369)
- Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343)
- [manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (#368)
- [manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (#367)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No localized examples; [I18N-ISSUE-413] (#337)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest; [I18N-ISSUE-414] (#336)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest; [I18N-ISSUE-414] (#336)
- Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32)
- Re: [permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32)
- Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Browser test builds are failing (#339)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28)
- Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28)
- Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28)
- Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366)
- [permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32)
- [spec-reviews] CSV on the Web (#55)
- Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365)
- Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
Saturday, 25 April 2015
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
Friday, 24 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- [DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1)
- [DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1)
- [uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
Thursday, 23 April 2015
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Web NFC API (#22)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24)
- Re: [spec-reviews] multipart/form-data (#34)
- Re: [spec-reviews] multipart/form-data (#34)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38)
- Re: [spec-reviews] JSON Form Submission (#40)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Variables (#41)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50)
- [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Subresource Integrity (#43)
- Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45)
- Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45)
- [spec-reviews] contributing.md document needed for tag reviews (#53)
- Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14)
- [streams] WritableStream constructor: strategy should be set before sync with queue (#346)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347)
- Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50)
- Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326)
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47)
- [IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- [push-api] Service worker events (#146)
- [push-api] The push event (#145)
- Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340)
- Re: [streams] Separate strategy and underlying source/sink in constructor signatures (#338)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340)
- Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365)
- Re: [streams] Fix FinishClosingReadableStream algorithm (#345)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365)
- [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365)
- Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- [xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- [streams] Fix FinishClosingReadableStream algorithm (#345)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
Wednesday, 22 April 2015
- [IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1)
- Re: [push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144)
- [packaging-on-the-web] Reflect the discussion in the April 2015 F2F (#25)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27)
- Re: [push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144)
- Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27)
- Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- [push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8)
- [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364)
- Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326)
- Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685)
- Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- [manifest] Deep linking - need proper use cases and requirements analysis (#363)
- Re: [permissions] Geolocation API does not leave the page unaware of permission status (#30)
- Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344)
- Re: [push-api] Fix method links from IDL. (#143)
- [push-api] Fix method links from IDL. (#143)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142)
- [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#139)
- Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677)
- Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343)
- Re: [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [streams] Make sure promise returning methods don't throw (#342)
- [streams] Make sure promise returning methods don't throw (#342)
- [streams] listen() (#341)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [push-api] Readme implementations (#141)
- Re: [push-api] Any implementation ? (#119)
- [push-api] Readme implementations (#141)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [push-api] Add serializer for PushSubscription and run tidy. (#140)
- Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125)
- [push-api] Add serializer for PushSubscription and run tidy. (#140)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685)
- [ServiceWorker] You don't need any flags in Chrome today :) (#686)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] Rename userVisible to userVisibleOnly (#138)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#139)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684)
- [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640)
- Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329)
- [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685)
- [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3)
- Re: [FileAPI] Relation to File URI scheme (#6)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Revise CSS regions draft based on outcome of 19-March discussion (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Revise CSS regions draft based on outcome of 19-March discussion (#47)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions (#35)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions (#35)
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- [clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3)
- [FileAPI] Relation to File URI scheme (#6)
- Re: [dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (c97daed)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (#24)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [dom] createDocument link is broken (#25)
- Re: [dom] createDocument link is broken (#25)
- Re: [dom] Bikeshed-related fixes (#26)
- [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- [dom] Bikeshed-related fixes (#26)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [dom] createDocument link is broken (#25)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683)
Monday, 20 April 2015
- Re: [spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52)
- Re: [spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52)
- Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [streams] Browser test builds are failing (#339)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [streams] Separate strategy and underlying source/sink in constructor signatures (#338)
- Re: [streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326)
- Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [permissions] Rename PermissionStatus.status to PermissionStatus.state (#31)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- [permissions] Geolocation API does not leave the page unaware of permission status (#30)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- [push-api] Rename userVisible to userVisibleOnly (#138)
- [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (a9037ac)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7)
Sunday, 19 April 2015
- Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334)
- Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334)
- Re: [streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- [dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (#24)
- [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683)
Saturday, 18 April 2015
- [spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [streams] Avoid using binary (#337)
- Re: [streams] Avoid using binary (#337)
- [streams] Avoid using binary (#337)
- Re: [webidl] Fix up a bunch of cases in maplike/setlike code where we were working with the interface instance when we meant to work with the backing object or returning the backing object when we meant to return the interface instance. (#47)
- Re: [webidl] Fix up a bunch of cases in maplike/setlike code where we were working with the interface instance when we meant to work with the backing object or returning the backing object when we meant to return the interface instance. (#47)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
Friday, 17 April 2015
- [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- [FileAPI] Bikeshedding the spec (#5)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362)
- Re: [manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- [manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362)
- Re: [streams] Fix a typo (7f2ff8a)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Remove registrationId (#56)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should skipWaiting() wait for an "in-progress request" to finish? (#569)
- [webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42)
- Re: [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49)
- [dom] High resolution timing for events (#23)
- Re: [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] distinguish between cache failures due to network vs disk quota (#286)
- Re: [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49)
- Re: [webidl] Make the properties on the named properties object writable, so they don't prevent assignment to undeclared props on the window. (#48)
- Re: [webidl] Fix up a bunch of cases in maplike/setlike code where we were working with the interface instance when we meant to work with the backing object or returning the backing object when we meant to return the interface instance. (#47)
- [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
Thursday, 16 April 2015
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332)
- Re: [streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [streams] "binary stream might contain chunks consisting o..." (#336)
- Re: [streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [streams] Fix a typo (7f2ff8a)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Rename "App server" to "Application server" in diagram (#135)
- [push-api] Rename "App server" to "Application server" in diagram (#135)
- Re: [push-api] Add the source of the sequence diagram in vdx format. (#134)
- [push-api] Add the source of the sequence diagram in vdx format. (#134)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [FileAPI] Apply HTTPS fix to IETF links on TR.html too (#4)
- Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3)
- [FileAPI] Apply HTTPS fix to IETF links on TR.html too (#4)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3)
- Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3)
- Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3)
- [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129)
- Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51)
- Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2)
- Re: [FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Rename to index.html, fixes #1 (#2)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- [fetch] Track request originator. (#45)
- [clipboard-apis] Rename to index.html, fixes #1 (#2)
- Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- [FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- [streams] "binary stream might contain chunks consisting o..." (#336)
- Re: [streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335)
- [streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334)
- [streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [dom] Convert DOM to use bikeshed (#15)
- Re: [dom] Convert DOM to use bikeshed (#15)
- Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21)
- Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21)
- Re: [dom] Indicate GitHub issues can now be used (#14)
- Re: [dom] Indicate GitHub issues can now be used (#14)
- Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20)
- Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20)
- Re: [dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19)
- Re: [dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19)
- Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20)
- [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22)
- [dom] Header is all wrong (#21)
- Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18)
- Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18)
- [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20)
- [dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19)
- [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18)
- [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17)
- Re: [dom] Convert to Bikeshed. (#16)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
Wednesday, 15 April 2015
- Re: [FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- [FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1)
- [dom] Convert to Bikeshed. (#16)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- [ServiceWorker] SW's default lifetime limit (#679)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330)
- [streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332)
- Re: [streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331)
- [streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331)
- [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330)
- Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328)
- Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328)
Tuesday, 14 April 2015
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253)
- Re: [touch-events] Not all touch events should be synchronous and uncancelable (#6)
- Re: [streams] Fix #314: pipeTo return value with preventClose: true (5250b3d)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1)
- Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [streams] Fix assert in ErrorReadableStream being triggered sometimes (884d4b7)
- Re: [streams] Ensure asserts are surfaced in the reference implementation (3144a19)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
Monday, 13 April 2015
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22)
- [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50)
- Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49)
- [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295)
- Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128)
- Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327)
- Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358)
- Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358)
- Re: [push-api] Remove [NoInterfaceObject] from PushMessageData (#123)
- Re: [push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124)
- Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128)
- Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128)
- Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126)
- Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295)
- Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295)
- Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- [streams] readBatch() or getSyncReader() (#327)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
Sunday, 12 April 2015
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Suggested edits to paragraph about declarative-only solutions (#676)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigate and redirects (#654)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
Saturday, 11 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253)
- Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- [webidl] Make the properties on the named properties object writable, so they don't prevent assignment to undeclared props on the window. (#48)
- [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
Friday, 10 April 2015
- [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677)
- Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253)
- Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigate and redirects (#654)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text. (e0dbaa0)
- Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325)
- Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325)
Thursday, 9 April 2015
- Re: [quota-api] fixing typo (#4)
- Re: [ime-api] fixing typo (#3)
- [ime-api] fixing typo (#3)
- [quota-api] fixing typo (#4)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325)
- Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- [ServiceWorker] Suggested edits to paragraph about declarative-only solutions (#676)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29)
- [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397)
- Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324)
- Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45)
- Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324)
- Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff)
- Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff)
- Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41)
- [streams] pipe redirection (#325)
- [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41)
- Re: [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#39)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40)
- Re: [webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
Wednesday, 8 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- [webidl] Fix up a bunch of cases in maplike/setlike code where we were working with the interface instance when we meant to work with the backing object or returning the backing object when we meant to return the interface instance. (#47)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358)
- Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319)
- [webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40)
- Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- [ime-api] Broken fragments in Annex.html (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [fetch] Redirects can modify request's method (#32)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- [streams] Identity transform performance and ArrayBufferView ownership (#323)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319)
- Re: [streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314)
- Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- [permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
- [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)
Tuesday, 7 April 2015
- Re: [permissions] Flesh out more complex permission issues we see down the road (#28)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- [permissions] Flesh out more complex permission issues we see down the road (#28)
- [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357)
- Re: [manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357)
- [manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356)
- Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355)
- [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354)
- Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353)
- [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319)
- [streams] Port precise flow control to writable streams (#318)
- [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317)
- [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316)
- Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46)
- Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46)
- Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46)
- Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46)
- Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344)
- Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344)
- [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46)
- [ime-api] Remove reference to ime-mode? (#1)
- [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315)
- [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675)
- Re: [permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27)
- Re: [permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27)
- [permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25)
- [permissions] Add "fullscreen" (#26)
- Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25)
- [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- [fetch] Provide opt-out for HTTP proxy authentication? (#42)
- [fetch] Provide opt-in for Expect = "100-continue" (#41)
- Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- [quota-api] Javascript: Don't use non-constructible classes as namespaces (#3)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658)
- [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2)
- [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675)
- [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#39)
- Re: [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#38)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#38)
- Re: [quota-api] how should file de-duplication be represented? (#1)
- [quota-api] how should file de-duplication be represented? (#1)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674)
- Re: [manifest] Small editorial fixes (#352)
- [manifest] Small editorial fixes (#352)
Monday, 6 April 2015
- [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350)
- Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302)
- Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302)
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271)
- Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276)
- Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276)
- Re: [streams] Transform stream base class (or other helper) in toolbox (#20)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9)
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344)
- Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346)
- Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349)
- Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24)
- Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24)
- Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24)
- [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24)
- Re: [permissions] A few typos (#23)
- Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335)
- [streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314)
- Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673)
- Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313)
- Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313)
- Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313)
- [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313)
- Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e)
- Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e)
- Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882)
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e)
- Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e)
- Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [streams] Tweak spec mechanics of WritableStream Error Functions (84efaaf)
- Re: [streams] Factor out ReadFromReadableStreamReader abstract operation (ec27914)
- Re: [streams] Add and update notes on using abstract ops from other specs (80e578d)
- Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882)
- Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25)
- Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312)
- [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350)
- Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No direction metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-416] (#334)
- Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
Sunday, 5 April 2015
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] 304 handling for fetch() (#412)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] 304 handling for fetch() (#412)
- [fetch] Cache mode: fromCache (#40)
- [fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39)
- [fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support range request in fetch() and cache (#288)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Support range request in fetch() and cache (#288)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] User-Agent header control (#399)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] User-Agent header control (#399)
- [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How does the fetch event interact with system cache? (#86)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Fetch: handling upload progress events (#289)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Fetch: handling upload progress events (#289)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add support for streams (#533)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Add support for streams (#533)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244)
- Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25)
- Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25)
- Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25)
- Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25)
Saturday, 4 April 2015
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349)
- Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36)
- Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36)
- Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301)
Friday, 3 April 2015
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- [permissions] A few typos (#23)
- [permissions] Privacy Considerations (#22)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28)
- Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26)
- Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker to "service worker" mapping and stability (#622)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
Thursday, 2 April 2015
- Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311)
- Re: [manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348)
- Re: [manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348)
- [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349)
- Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346)
- Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346)
- [manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344)
- [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- [ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347)
- [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
Wednesday, 1 April 2015
- Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33)
- [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669)
- Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346)
- [quota-api] Add Github repository data to boilerplate (#15)
- Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- [fetch] Redirects can modify request's method (#32)
- Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- [streams] Define the streams interface with only publicly visible behavior (#312)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)
- Re: [streams] Making the "queue manipulator" its own class (#309)
- Re: [streams] Factor out a new EnqueueInReadableStream abstract operation (329f696)
- Re: [streams] Factor out a new CloseReadableStream abstract operation (85d0645)
- Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)
- Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)