- From: John Mellor <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:37:15 -0800
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 18:37:43 UTC
> @@ -642,6 +664,100 @@ > </section> > <section> > <h2> > + <code>PushMessageData</code> interface > + </h2> > + <div class="idl" title="typedef (Blob or BufferSource or USVString) PushMessageDataInit"> > + </div> > + <dl title= > + "[Constructor(PushMessageDataInit init), Exposed=ServiceWorker] interface PushMessageData" @annevk where might we define such a generic object? WebIDL? Could we just make ArrayBuffer more powerful? I've [made PushMessageData a NoInterfaceObject](https://github.com/johnmellor/push-api/commit/b05231cce0f3415992d2dfeec290a6d174d0ef29) for now so that it could be swapped out for such a generic object in future. Does that sound reasonable? @beverloo's [not convinced](https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/88#discussion_r20810189) that it's worth it. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/88/files#r20811259
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 18:37:43 UTC