Wednesday, 31 December 2014
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- [ServiceWorker] Inclusion of `referer` in preflight `Access-Control-Request-Headers` despite not being set (#596)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7)
- Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#297)
- Re: [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (#296)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
Tuesday, 30 December 2014
- Re: [streams] Add popover on branch and commit snapshots (#221)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- [url] Add method to return delegation boundary of a URL (#39)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272)
- Re: [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (e3b2821)
- Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (dc34c95)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "The double square bracket notation ([[name of method or name of property]]) is used throughout the specification to indicate user agent's internal data structures." (#529)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "The double square bracket notation ([[name of method or name of property]]) is used throughout the specification to indicate user agent's internal data structures." (#529)
- [manifest] Define identity of a web app (closes #272) (#297)
- [manifest] expanded navigation scope text (#296)
Monday, 29 December 2014
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38)
- Re: [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
Sunday, 28 December 2014
- [url] make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF (#38)
- [url] be explicit about change control issue (#37)
- [url] point to W3C bugzilla as evidence of past WHATWG/W3C work (#36)
- [url] list more radical rewrite as a possible outcome (#35)
- [url] clarify "scheme specific definitions" problem (#34)
- [url] note kinds of interop issues (#33)
- [url] clarify "parameterization" problem (#32)
- [url] are naming in APIs a problem IETF should solve (#31)
- [url] IETF examples of using "URL" rather than "URI" (#30)
- [url] be clearer about problem-statement draft purpose, and plan of work (#29)
- [url] note possibility of implementation-dependent file: (#28)
- [url] any update to 3986 must meet requirements for updating IETF Standard (#27)
- Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22)
- Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22)
Friday, 26 December 2014
- [selection-api] support selection.containsNode(obj, true) (#39)
- Re: [url] Address more comments (#26)
- Re: [url] Address more comments (#26)
- [url] Address more comments (#26)
- Re: [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23)
- Re: [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23)
- [url] test URL-encoding of forms in HTML (#25)
- Re: [url] Added inScope static (#22)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
- [ServiceWorker] Default scope to register() (#595)
Thursday, 25 December 2014
Wednesday, 24 December 2014
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [url] address comments (#24)
- [url] address comments (#24)
- [url] remaining comments from Larry (#23)
- [url] Added inScope static (#22)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
Tuesday, 23 December 2014
- Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37)
- Re: [streams] typo (#257)
- Re: [streams] typo (#257)
- [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Add links to some TF resources. (#35)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
Monday, 22 December 2014
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20)
- [streams] typo (#257)
- Re: [selection-api] Need a way to get combining character status from Range or offset (#31)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295)
- Re: [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295)
- [manifest] Cleaned up markup and cross refs (#295)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
Sunday, 21 December 2014
Saturday, 20 December 2014
- [editing-explainer] Add links to some TF resources. (#35)
- Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288)
- [manifest] Allow multiple application contexts per app (#294)
- Re: [manifest] Link space / "deep linking" (#288)
- Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292)
- Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292)
- Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272)
- Re: [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292)
- Re: [manifest] added text about installable web apps (#290)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] Clarify that start URL is not always `start_url`'s value (#293)
- Re: [manifest] Need to define how to apply the manifest (#226)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd)
- Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73)
- [manifest] Clarify that start URL is not always `start_url`'s value (#293)
- Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289)
Friday, 19 December 2014
- Re: [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256)
- [webidl] Stringifier says it requires DOMString, but should also allow USVString (#35)
- [streams] Allow object with methods to be passed as (writeable) sink (#256)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- [manifest] manifest should be queried when app is launched from home screen (#292)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (e5c4dcd)
- Re: [manifest] When created, navigate to start url (b9fde73)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [url] mention RFC 4395, typos, lc/uc, add comments (#21)
- [url] mention RFC 4395, typos, lc/uc, add comments (#21)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594)
- [manifest] define URL Scope (closes #114) (#291)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479)
- [url] URL comparison methods (#20)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
Thursday, 18 December 2014
- Re: [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479)
- [push-api] Mention what to do in register() and getRegistration() if there is no active SW (#100)
- Re: [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19)
- Re: [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19)
- [url] fix ID references, fix WG element, fix AREA element, remove unneeded emp... (#19)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [manifest] Cookies and data collection policies (#281)
- Re: [manifest] Cookies and data collection policies (#281)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest icon's 'type' should be a valid IMAGE mime type, not a valid mime type (#287)
- Re: [manifest] Manifest icon's 'type' should be a valid IMAGE mime type, not a valid mime type (#287)
- Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272)
- Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
Wednesday, 17 December 2014
- [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing support IME text replacement? (#34)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [url] RFC 3987 topics not included in the URL standard (#18)
- [url] RFC 3987 topics not included in the URL standard (#18)
- Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272)
- Re: [url] Update url-problem-statement.xml (#17)
- [url] Update url-problem-statement.xml (#17)
- Re: [manifest] What is the identity of an app? (#272)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594)
- [ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() on an installed worker should abort Install step "Wait until no service worker client is using registration." (#594)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- [manifest] added text about installable web apps (#290)
- [manifest] specified applying a manifest (closes #226) (#289)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
Tuesday, 16 December 2014
- [ServiceWorker] IDL nit: missing semicolon (#593)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Rename the Client interface (#350)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591)
- [ServiceWorker] Grammatical fix (#591)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [manifest] Need to define how to apply the manifest (#226)
- Re: [manifest] URL for updating badge/tag (e.g. number of messages waiting) (#268)
- Re: [manifest] URL for updating badge/tag (e.g. number of messages waiting) (#268)
- Re: [manifest] Icon density parsing should have a developer warning (#282)
- Re: [manifest] Icon density parsing should have a developer warning (#282)
Monday, 15 December 2014
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99)
- Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47)
- Re: [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47)
- [push-api] Rename PushRegistrationManager to PushManager. (#99)
- [webcomponents] change acc name advice (#31)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- [push-api] Rename (un)register to (un)subscribe (#98)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- [push-api] Move unregister() to PushRegistration. (#97)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- [push-api] .getRegistration() should not reject if there is no registration (but return a null object) (#96)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- [push-api] Technique to Detect Endpoint Prior to register() (#95)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- [webcomponents] acknowledgement for semantics content (#30)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589)
- Re: [webidl] Transferables (#34)
- [webidl] Transferables (#34)
Sunday, 14 December 2014
- [webcomponents] extended examples and added developer advice section (#29)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] Fixed typo. (#24)
- Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
Friday, 12 December 2014
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Where to put client / context (#318)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Where to put client / context (#318)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575)
- [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590)
- [ServiceWorker] Use "client request"… (#589)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient to Client (#588)
- Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- Re: [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- [streams] Reorganize examples (#255)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
Thursday, 11 December 2014
- [streams] Document globals created by this spec (#254)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [webcomponents] Change pub date to 16-Dec-2014 (#28)
- [webcomponents] Change pub date to 16-Dec-2014 (#28)
Wednesday, 10 December 2014
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- [selection-api] Specify Selection.setPosition()? (#38)
- [selection-api] Specify Selection.modify()? (#37)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- [streams] How will ReadableByteStream work with seekable resources? (#253)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [streams] Garbage collection (#252)
- [push-api] unregister() should be available on the PushRegistration object (#94)
- [streams] Garbage collection (#252)
- [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587)
- Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.empty() as an alias of removeAllRanges() (#36)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- [selection-api] Specify Selection.empty() as an alias of removeAllRanges() (#36)
- Re: [selection-api] Add Selection.type to the spec (#14)
- Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35)
- Re: [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35)
- [selection-api] Specify Selection.type? (#35)
- [selection-api] Specify baseNode/baseOffset/extentNode/extentOffset? (#34)
- [selection-api] unsigned long is never negative (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A programmatic and reliable way to unregister all ports (even it's used from others tabs) (#579)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583)
- [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controlling? (#583)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope? (#582)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the term for "Intentions" (#7)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- [selection-api] Need to be able to tell if the caret is displayed at the beginning or the end of the line (#32)
- [selection-api] Need a way to get combining character status from Range or offset (#31)
- [editing-explainer] How do we feature detect Responsive Input Events? (#32)
- [editing-explainer] Should sites be able to control Responsive Input Language? (#31)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- [editing-explainer] Should undo/redo be beforeInput events? (#30)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Need to spec the data in beforeInput event (#29)
- [editing-explainer] Need to spec the data in beforeInput event (#29)
- [editing-explainer] How does cE=typing work with overtype (insert key is on) (#28)
- [editing-explainer] Should beforeFocus be another Responsive Input Event? (#27)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26)
- [editing-explainer] Should beforeInput Event happen if there is no selection? (#26)
- [editing-explainer] Should Device-Specific Input Events say what Responsive Input Event they will cause? (#25)
- [editing-explainer] What should be the target element for Responsive Input Events? (#24)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585)
- Re: [url] Basic URL parser doesn't return anything (#10)
- [selection-api] Make some arguments optional (#30)
- Re: [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- [selection-api] Add a "Selection interface" section (#29)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Privacy consideration about the "cache" parameter of the Request object (#585)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398)
- [ServiceWorker] Security consideration about the `cache` parameter of `Request` (#585)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] fetch() cache control options (#398)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [manifest] URL Scope to which the manifest applies (#114)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584)
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- [streams] WIP: exclusive reader interface (#251)
- [ServiceWorker] Why is required a page reload to enable SW controller? (#583)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] A way to coordinate the refresh of all controlled windows to facilitate an upgrade (#422)
- [ServiceWorker] How many workers can be registered in the same page or scope (#582)
Tuesday, 9 December 2014
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566)
- Re: [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Add link to charter. (#23)
- Re: [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92)
- Re: [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92)
- Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12)
- Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12)
- Re: [url] What does invoke mean? (#15)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- [push-api] endpoint should be of type URL not DOMString (#93)
- Re: [webcomponents] fixed code examples (#27)
- Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16)
- Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16)
- Re: [url] What does invoke mean? (#15)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11)
- Re: [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12)
- Re: [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- [editing-explainer] Add link to charter. (#23)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453)
- [push-api] Push registration should require active Service Worker (#92)
- [url] domainToUnicode cannot be defined in terms of domainToASCII (#16)
- [url] What does invoke mean? (#15)
- [url] Parser seems to return strings rather than data types (#14)
- [url] "full stop code points" (#13)
- Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- [url] Writing IPv4 addresses (#12)
- Re: [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11)
- [url] ASCII whitespace is no longer defined (#11)
- [url] Basic URL parser doesn't return anything (#10)
- [url] Why is Hosts not a separate section? (#9)
- Re: [url] What is authoring requirements even about? (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- [webcomponents] fixed code examples (#27)
- [ServiceWorker] window.fetch (#581)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
Monday, 8 December 2014
- [selection-api] Specify where the caret should be placed in the markup (#28)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6)
- Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- [editing-explainer] behavior of text nodes inside cE=typing (#22)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21)
- Re: [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20)
- [editing-explainer] Where can text be inserted? (and how? can UA create text nodes?) (#21)
- Re: [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20)
- [editing-explainer] ContentEditable with UserSelect=None needs to be documented (#20)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- [webcomponents] added guts of custom elements semantics section (#26)
- Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- Re: [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- [streams] Fix ReadableStream constructor if not getting a promise as startResult (#250)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- [ServiceWorker] Message-driven communication between workers and consumers (#580)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- [ServiceWorker] A programmatic and reliable way to unregister all ports (even it's used from others tabs) (#579)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Typo in explainer, code example, catch portion (#577)
Sunday, 7 December 2014
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- [ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- [ServiceWorker] Typo in explainer, code example, catch portion (#577)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
Saturday, 6 December 2014
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
Friday, 5 December 2014
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33)
- Re: [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91)
- Re: [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91)
- [push-api] removed wrong curly bracket in example (#91)
- Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5)
- Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33)
- Re: [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535)
- [webidl] Numeric type reform strawperson (#33)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576)
- Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47)
- Re: [push-api] ServiceWorkerRegistration.pushRegistrationManager is very verbose (#47)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- Re: [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
Thursday, 4 December 2014
- [selection-api] caret-based selection movement (#27)
- [streams] Clarify how/whether Stream/TransformStream may read/write "messages" (#249)
- Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] window.caches and window.fetch should be [Replaceable] (#535)
- Re: [url] Editors' listing and status (#5)
- [url] Editors' listing and status (#5)
- [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can Cache.add() committing at response resolution lead to duplicate requests? (#361)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- [ServiceWorker] Background caching (#574)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- [ServiceWorker] Can caches store and retrieve results that are still being written to the cache? (#573)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527)
- [ServiceWorker] IDL: define ContextFrameType (#572)
- [screen-orientation] The orientation type 'Natural' should only lock to x-primary (#83)
- Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
- Re: [url] What is "result"? (#5)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
Wednesday, 3 December 2014
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should DedicatedWorkers select their own ServiceWorkerRegistration? (#423)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Should skipWaiting() wait for an "in-progress request" to finish? (#569)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90)
- Re: [push-api] Use ExtendableEventInit instead of EventInit (#78)
- Re: [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570)
- [push-api] Make PushEventInit inherit from ExtendableEventInit (#90)
- Re: [push-api] Use ExtendableEventInit instead of EventInit (#78)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How should custom controls declare their intention? (#18)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should we include the default result in the Intention Event? (#10)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Should we include the default result in the Intention Event? (#10)
- [selection-api] Should we include the default result in the beforeSelectionChange Event? (#26)
- Re: [selection-api] Remove "Specification" from the title (#15)
- Re: [editing-explainer] How can we integrate with rich forms and validation? (#6)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the shape of contentEditable? (#4)
- Re: [editing-explainer] intents originating from components resp. scripts (#16)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Consistent Shape for Intention Events (#12)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Consistent Shape for Intention Events (#12)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Does ClipboardEvents need to match the shape of other Intention Events (#8)
- Re: [editing-explainer] BeforeInput or CommandEvent? (#9)
- Re: [editing-explainer] Add a section for "new low-level APIs" to Editing Explainer (#3)
- Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand or something new to fire IntentionEvents? (#5)
- Re: [editing-explainer] What should be the shape of contentEditable? (#4)
- [ServiceWorker] Define promise type of ServiceWorkerClient::focus() (#571)
- [manifest] Link space (#288)
Tuesday, 2 December 2014
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only? (#245)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [permissions] Redundant assertion (#2)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] What happens if there's an appcache manifest? (#275)
- Re: [streams] Should we "lock" readable streams while piping? (#241)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
Monday, 1 December 2014
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [push-api] Add and Encryption Key array to the PushRegistration interface (#89)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [streams] Make .ready fulfill-only (#248)
- Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570)
- [ServiceWorker] Prefetching resources using SW (#570)