Weekly github digest (Service Worker WG specs)

Issues
------
* w3c/ServiceWorker (+3/-1/💬23)
  3 issues created:
  - Recovering from start failures (by ytausky)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1503 
  - Should we consider Worklets as clients? (by bakulf)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1502 
  - Service worker spec meetup (by jakearchibald)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1501 

  5 issues received 23 new comments:
  - #1503 Recovering from start failures (5 by bzbarsky, mattto, wanderview, ytausky)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1503 
  - #1502 Should we consider Worklets as clients? (2 by nhiroki, wanderview)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1502 
  - #1501 Service worker spec meetup (12 by jakearchibald, jungkees, mattto, mkruisselbrink, n8schloss, wanderview, xtuc)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1501 
  - #1500 navigate() behavior in browsers for file:/// and mixed content does not match spec (1 by jakearchibald)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1500 
  - #1499 Size limits with synchronous WebAssembly functions (3 by Pauan, annevk)
    https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1499 

  1 issues closed:
  - Service worker spec meetup https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1501 




Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 17:01:10 UTC