- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:01:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-github-weekly@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1hT890-0004qo-3s@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/ServiceWorker (+3/-2/💬14)
3 issues created:
- Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (by makotoshimazu)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1408
- Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (by littledan)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407
- New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. (by tingshao)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406
4 issues received 14 new comments:
- #1407 Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (9 by jakearchibald, littledan, wanderview)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407
- #1408 Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (2 by makotoshimazu, mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1408
- #1406 New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. (2 by makotoshimazu, tingshao)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406
- #1399 Pass credentials on navigator.serviceWorker.register("/service_worker.js"); (1 by SystemR)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1399
2 issues closed:
- New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406
- Pass credentials on navigator.serviceWorker.register("/service_worker.js"); https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1399
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 17:01:55 UTC