- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:01:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-github-weekly@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1hT890-0004qo-3s@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/ServiceWorker (+3/-2/💬14) 3 issues created: - Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (by makotoshimazu) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1408 - Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (by littledan) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407 - New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. (by tingshao) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406 4 issues received 14 new comments: - #1407 Top-level await integration for ServiceWorkers running modules (9 by jakearchibald, littledan, wanderview) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407 - #1408 Should register() trigger byte-for-byte checking when WorkerType is updated? (2 by makotoshimazu, mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1408 - #1406 New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. (2 by makotoshimazu, tingshao) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406 - #1399 Pass credentials on navigator.serviceWorker.register("/service_worker.js"); (1 by SystemR) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1399 2 issues closed: - New 'update via cache' value doesn't take effect in register algorithm. https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1406 - Pass credentials on navigator.serviceWorker.register("/service_worker.js"); https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1399 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 17:01:55 UTC