- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:01:58 +0000
- To: public-webapps-github-weekly@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1h6I7i-0003P5-1S@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/ServiceWorker (+2/-2/💬19)
2 issues created:
- Is respondWith(fetch(event.request)) always the same as not calling respondWith()? (by mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1395
- Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? (by mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394
5 issues received 19 new comments:
- #1213 async waitUntil microtask issue (10 by annevk, mattto, asutherland, wanderview)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1213
- #1394 Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? (5 by mattto, wanderview)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394
- #707 Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (2 by NekR, wanderview)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/707 [apr-2017-f2f]
- #1392 Fully inline (.js + json manifest) service worker (1 by mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1392
- #1395 Is respondWith(fetch(event.request)) always the same as not calling respondWith()? (1 by annevk)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1395
2 issues closed:
- async waitUntil microtask issue https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1213
- Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/ServiceWorker (+0/-0/💬3)
2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #1242 Add CR Plan for V1 (2 by jungkees, mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1242
- #1175 Fix the perform the fetch steps in Update algorithm (1 by mattto)
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1175
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 17:01:59 UTC