- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 17:01:58 +0000
- To: public-webapps-github-weekly@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1h6I7i-0003P5-1S@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/ServiceWorker (+2/-2/💬19) 2 issues created: - Is respondWith(fetch(event.request)) always the same as not calling respondWith()? (by mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1395 - Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? (by mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394 5 issues received 19 new comments: - #1213 async waitUntil microtask issue (10 by annevk, mattto, asutherland, wanderview) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1213 - #1394 Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? (5 by mattto, wanderview) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394 - #707 Add cookie accessor/setter methods? (2 by NekR, wanderview) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/707 [apr-2017-f2f] - #1392 Fully inline (.js + json manifest) service worker (1 by mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1392 - #1395 Is respondWith(fetch(event.request)) always the same as not calling respondWith()? (1 by annevk) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1395 2 issues closed: - async waitUntil microtask issue https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1213 - Can respondWith() be called from a microtask? https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1394 Pull requests ------------- * w3c/ServiceWorker (+0/-0/💬3) 2 pull requests received 3 new comments: - #1242 Add CR Plan for V1 (2 by jungkees, mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1242 - #1175 Fix the perform the fetch steps in Update algorithm (1 by mattto) https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1175 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2019 17:01:59 UTC