[Bug 28591] [Shadow]: Figure out a good replacement for /deep/ in testing scenarios

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28591

--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Anne from comment #1)
> 1) We shouldn't do features for testing. That's bad.
> 
> 2) I remain convinced that in the open case we should provide a myriad of
> features that cross the "deep" to aid with selection, event delegation,
> composition, etc.

+1, we should keep /deep/ in the static profile for querySelector. Before we
had it authors kept rolling their own (we saw this on multiple occasions).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 3 May 2015 00:41:04 UTC