- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 19:35:52 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28117 --- Comment #2 from Naren <naren@vimeo.com> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #1) > It seems what browsers are doing here does violate the specification as > written. I wonder if a redirect resets the timeout as well... You guessed it right. Redirect does reset the timeout. > > On a different note, could you perhaps indicate whether > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/thread. > html#msg646 would be of any help? (Caching of CORS preflights for an entire > origin when no credentials are involved.) It's pretty hard to get feedback > from users of CORS. Caching of CORS preflight even for a single resource will improve performance by a great deal. Some of the use cases are posting data to a log server or sending resumable /chunked uploads to say Google cloud storage or Amazon S3. Your proposal on caching for entire origin is a great idea. But I have to agree with Brad (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/0650.html) especially this part: On disadvantages of headers: 1) Individual resources declaring policy for an entire origin can be problematic and difficult to manage. I will give some more thought and comment on your CORS performance thread. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2015 19:35:58 UTC