[Bug 28943] New: avoid "nuked"

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28943

            Bug ID: 28943
           Summary: avoid "nuked"
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: trivial
          Priority: P2
         Component: DOM
          Assignee: annevk@annevk.nl
          Reporter: plh@w3.org
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, www-dom@w3.org

Art reminded me about this one, so here is a proper bug.

In 
 http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/#interface-domerror

[[
On 7/10/14 12:25 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
> The language "nuked from orbit soon" and "will be nuked" needs to be 
> rewritten. This level of informality is inappropriate for a W3C REC 
> track document. Better to say "expect to be deprecated" or similar.

I agree with this proposal (particularly since "nuke" might not 
translate accurately).

> It is annoying that a search for "Warning!" in the document fails (at 
> least on Chrome and Firefox) because it is injected from a content 
> style property.

This seems a bit like a personal preference to me. As such, I don't 
think it should block the LCWD publication although if Glenn created a 
PR that was agreeable to Robin, then I  don't see any harm in merging it.


> There remains a normative reference to the WHATWG "URL" specification, 
> which needs to be resolved before moving to REC. It would be well 
> advised to describe the expected process for doing this in the SoTD 
> section.

I don't think this point should block publication of a LCWD. (I also 
think the reference policy [1] describes a way to handle this for 
subsequent publications.)
]]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 15:04:50 UTC