- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:11:12 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22858
Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |d@domenic.me
--- Comment #3 from Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> ---
While I agree that the override of [[HasInstance]] seems pretty pointless, I
don't understand why it would be future-hostile. JS versions of the classes
could just override their @@hasInstance, e.g.
```js
class WebIDLThingy {
static [Symbol.hasInstance](x) {
return performBrandCheck(x);
}
}
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:11:22 UTC