- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:40:01 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28097
Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |adamk@chromium.org,
| |ayg@aryeh.name
--- Comment #1 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> ---
As far as I can tell you hit the host-including check as part of the insertion
operation of step 5.
The problematic scenario appears to be that you have a range that contains a
<template> and that <template> contains a node that you use as newParent
argument.
That would argue for a new step I think, as step 1 does not care about
newParent.
Also, how can newParent ever be a Text, Comment, or ProcessingInstruction node?
Is that for when the range is collapsed? But if it's not collapsed it seems
those nodes would be problematic...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 13:40:06 UTC