- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:29 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #148 from Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #143) > (In reply to Koji Ishii from comment #141) > > > > 1. The proposed algorithm stops event path for orphaned nodes > > When target nodes are not distributed, the event path in the current spec > > bubbles up to Document, but the proposed algorithm stops. Example: > > > > A > > SR > > B > > > > Note that SR does not have IP. When an event fires on B, the event path is: > > Current: B, SR, A, Document, Window > > Proposed: B > > But shouldn't B's destination insertion points be empty and from B event > propagate to A. > Or do I misunderstand your example? > (B is a child node of A) Sorry, I simplified the test case too much. The reproducible case is: A SR SIP B In this tree, B's destination insertion point is not empty, but B is not distributed. When an event fired on B: Current: B, SIP, SR, A, Document, Window Proposed: B So the two cases are similar but hit different causes: 1.1. When the shadow tree contains <shadow> but no <content> 1.2. When the younger shadow tree does not contain <shadow> When the shadow tree does not contain either <shadow> nor <content>, you're right that both algorithms produce the same results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 04:45:31 UTC