- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 04:45:29 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887
--- Comment #148 from Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Olli Pettay from comment #143)
> (In reply to Koji Ishii from comment #141)
> >
> > 1. The proposed algorithm stops event path for orphaned nodes
> > When target nodes are not distributed, the event path in the current spec
> > bubbles up to Document, but the proposed algorithm stops. Example:
> >
> > A
> > SR
> > B
> >
> > Note that SR does not have IP. When an event fires on B, the event path is:
> > Current: B, SR, A, Document, Window
> > Proposed: B
>
> But shouldn't B's destination insertion points be empty and from B event
> propagate to A.
> Or do I misunderstand your example?
> (B is a child node of A)
Sorry, I simplified the test case too much. The reproducible case is:
A
SR
SIP
B
In this tree, B's destination insertion point is not empty, but B is not
distributed. When an event fired on B:
Current: B, SIP, SR, A, Document, Window
Proposed: B
So the two cases are similar but hit different causes:
1.1. When the shadow tree contains <shadow> but no <content>
1.2. When the younger shadow tree does not contain <shadow>
When the shadow tree does not contain either <shadow> nor <content>, you're
right that both algorithms produce the same results.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 04:45:31 UTC