- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:26:03 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #195 from Olli Pettay <bugs@pettay.fi> --- (In reply to Koji Ishii from comment #192) > Finished analyzing the test results, here are two differences from > current/candidates algorithms. > > 1. As Hayato explained in the comment #191, older shadow roots are moved > from "before the IP they're distributed to" to "after younger shadow roots". > > D,C,M,L,R,Q,P,O,N,K,J,I,H,G,U,T,S,F,E,X,W,V,B,A > D,C,M,L,R,Q,P,O,N,K,J,I,H,G,U,T,S,F,X,W,V,E,B,A > And that is the issue. Now older shadow trees would have all the power to affect whether event even enters to younger tree (by using capturing listeners), but from rendering point of view the younger tree is still the parent of the older. In my mind the older tree is always distributed to <shadow>, which means that older shadow root is the connecting link between the older shadow tree and the <shadow> in the younger one. In other words <shadow> "shadow hosts" the older tree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 16:26:07 UTC