[Bug 27775] [Shadow]: Define the behavior of *closed* shadow trees.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27775

--- Comment #13 from Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> ---
Status update about spec-ing the closed mode.

Mostly done about low-hanging fruits. However, there are still remaining tasks:

1. event.path(): We should filter out a node in closed shadow tree.
  In addition to that, should we filter out a node in a open shadow tree if it
is descendant tree of a closed tree?
  In general, we can't determine the open/closed-ness in the local context. We
should consider the relationship between the current tree and the target tree,
e.g There is a closed shadow tree in the middle.

2. event retargeting
  Now we have a closed shadow tree. Should we continue an event retargeting
even in for open shadow trees? 
  How about *opt-in*?

3. Other issues for mixing open/closed shadow trees.
  I guess no one has investigated how this mixture of open/closed should work
seriously. We have to investigate further.



Anything else? If you notice something, please update this thread.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 16:06:48 UTC