[Bug 28522] [Shadow] Cascading for trees of no-inner/outer and no-younger/older relationship

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28522

--- Comment #1 from Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> ---
My current opinion is:

Case 1: The final destination wins for re-distributions.

Case 2: Prohibit this combination. I think the use cases for the
shadow-piercing descendant combinator is mostly "html >>>" or "* >>>", IIUC.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 07:57:39 UTC