- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 05:04:27 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23887 --- Comment #192 from Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> --- Finished analyzing the test results, here are two differences from current/candidates algorithms. 1. As Hayato explained in the comment #191, older shadow roots are moved from "before the IP they're distributed to" to "after younger shadow roots". D,C,M,L,R,Q,P,O,N,K,J,I,H,G,U,T,S,F,E,X,W,V,B,A D,C,M,L,R,Q,P,O,N,K,J,I,H,G,U,T,S,F,X,W,V,E,B,A 2. Older shadow roots that were not in the path are now included. Two examples below, when event target is "div <-- target", SR-OLDEST and SR-OLDER are now included. HOST div <-- target SR-OLDEST div SR-MIDDLE content SR-YOUNGEST shadow HOST SR-OLDER SR-YOUNGER shadow div <-- target I'm fine with either algorithm; both makes each own logical sense, do not break the principal rules, and technically correct (2nd diff above needs confirmation from Hayato though.) I think the most valuable thing at this point is to stabilize the algorithm and make implementations interoperable. Hope the WG resolves this issue this week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 05:04:42 UTC