- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:08:33 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28445
Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |annevk@annevk.nl
--- Comment #1 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
>From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015AprJun/0052.html
Annevk: " We're not sure about closed shadow DOM.
With composition/layout you want scripts to be able to go in and out.
(See also event retargeting.) For styling we'd like to see something
better than boundary-piercing. Ideally something akin to
pseudo-elements, but with the ability to put restrictions on the
amount of things they can affect. In Gecko we'll probably experiment
with "closed" in a way similar to Chrome (to get rid of XBL), but
unless we'd go down the isolated shadow DOM route (which seems
unlikely due to the overhead) that will require proprietary technology
that browsers are nowhere near ready to converge on."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 16:08:35 UTC